By David Butterfield
This is often the 1st distinct research of the destiny of Lucretius' De rerum natura from its beginnings within the 50s BC all the way down to the construction of our earliest extant manuscripts in the course of the Carolingian age. an in depth research of the data of Lucretius' poem between writers through the Roman, and for this reason the medieval, worlds permits clean perception into the work's readership and reception, and an overview of the worth of the oblique culture for enhancing the poem. the 1st prolonged research of the a hundred and seventy+ topic headings (capitula) that intersperse the textual content unearths the shut engagement of Roman readers. A clean inspection and assignation of marginal palms within the poem's most crucial manuscript presents new proof in regards to the paintings of Carolingian correctors and the foundation for a brand new Lucretian stemma codicum. extra rationalization of the interrelationship of Renaissance manuscripts of Lucretius offers extra proof of the poem's reception in fifteenth-century Italy
Read Online or Download The early textual history of Lucretius' "De rerum natura" PDF
Similar ancient & medieval literature books
Ovid's Heroides, a listing of letters by way of ladies who've been abandoned, has too often been tested as in simple terms a lament. In a brand new departure, this publication portrays the ladies of the Heroides as a group of authors. Combining shut readings of the texts and their mythological backgrounds with serious tools, the publication argues that the issues of similarity among different letters of the Heroides, so usually derided by way of sleek critics, symbolize an excellent exploitation of intratextuality, within which the Ovidian heroine self-consciously models herself as an alluding writer encouraged via what she has learn in the Heroides.
Technopaignia is the 1st accomplished assortment and scholarly research of a corpus of literary phenomena whose particularity is composed within the creative play with formal positive factors (acrostics, anagrams, palindromes and so on. ). The research either discusses each one phenomenon individually as part of the historical past of historic literature and touches upon extra primary questions about the notion of language, the interplay of literary creation and reception, the relation of literary and non-literary sorts of writing, the character of paintings and so forth.
This number of essays bargains a entire exam of texts that frequently were excluded from the most corpus of the traditional Greek novel and restrained to the margins of the style, corresponding to the "Life of Aesop", the "Life of Alexander the Great", and the "Acts of the Christian Martyrs".
This quantity is designed as a significant other to the traditional undergraduate mythology textbooks or, whilst assigned along the significant Greek and Roman works, as a source-based substitute to these textbooks. as well as the whole texts of the Homeric Hymns and Hesiod's Theogony, this assortment presents beneficiant decisions from over 50 texts composed among the Archaic Age and the fourth century A.
- American Culture in the 1940s
- The Poems of Oswald Von Wolkenstein: An English Translation of the Complete Works (1376/77–1445)
- Sobre los sueños ; Sobre José
- Tragic Pathos: Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy
Extra info for The early textual history of Lucretius' "De rerum natura"
Vind. 118 As regards the more interesting evidence of Politian’s marginal annotations in Laur. 29, the other primitive readings found in these annotations (see Reeve (2005, 145) for a signiﬁcant number) could be derived from χ, although their absence from other sets of corrections that I attribute to a collation of χ render it more probable that they were drawn directly from O. 62cap. 149cap. 269cap. 85 Iphianassai (if not drawn from Prisc. Inst. GLK II 285,11), 412 magnes, 649 haberet and 711 longi, all but the ﬁrst of which are manifestly impossible, could only have been drawn from O or χ.
390. 37 The extant Lucretian manuscripts copied from that of o (Vat. Pat. 312),114 was closely worked on in the 1450s (or perhaps 1440s) by one or more skilled Latinists who somehow had access to Lucretian readings antedating π. There are, however, no deﬁnite signs that the corrector(s) of φ had direct access to O: instead, we ﬁnd a number of signiﬁcant oversights from that manuscript, even in the earliest stages of codices constituting the φ group. The most natural explanation for how this cognisance of non-π readings arose is that the mediaeval MS χ was recollated, or less probably re-copied, in the 1420s or 1430s (a possible date will be given below).
Pat. 312) and x (Malatest. Ces. S 20 4); the readings of the φ group (on which see the close of this chapter), which demonstrate frequent emendation and contamination, require more careful analysis. 871 (in Qπ : ni O : nil Pontanus) is from coincidental conjecture in π. 23 The extant Lucretian manuscripts OQS (itself bipartite) and π. On the basis that Murbach possessed a copy of Lucretius from the ninth century,70 it was conjectured that the manuscript Poggio found in a locus . . satis longinquus (cf.