By Alun Munslow

The Routledge significant other to ancient reviews offers a much-needed severe creation to the key historians and philosophers including the primary concerns, rules and theories that have triggered the rethinking of background that has accrued velocity because the Nineties. With twenty-nine new entries, and lots of which have been considerably up-to-date, key thoughts for the hot historical past are tested in the course of the rules of prime thinkers resembling Kant, Nietzsche, Croce, Collingwood, White, Foucault and Derrida, and topics variety over classification, empiricism, hermeneutics, inference, relativism and know-how. New entries for the second one variation contain: Carl Becker Frank R. Ankersmit Jean-Francois Lyotard gender justified trust the classy flip race movie biography cultural heritage severe thought and experimental background. With a revised creation taking off the country of the self-discipline of heritage this present day, in addition to a longer and up to date bibliography, this is the basic reference paintings for all scholars of historical past.

Show description

Read or Download The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies, 2nd edition (Routledge Companions to History) PDF

Best history_1 books

Time and Eternity: The Medieval Discourse

This quantity consists of chosen papers from the most strand, ? Time and Eternity? , on the 7th foreign Medieval Congress held in July 2000 at Leeds. It attests to the truth that the medieval adventure of time and eternity was once wealthy and intricate, and that its research is open to numerous methods and techniques.

Extra info for The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies, 2nd edition (Routledge Companions to History)

Example text

This returns us to the distinction between ‘the past’ and ‘history’. Neither ‘the past’ nor its evidence creates ‘history’ – only historians do that. They do it when they construct a narrative the logic of which, in turn, becomes the default logic of history. History is, as Ankersmit perceptively explains, a substitute representation for the past. This means, of course, rejecting the conventional definition of epistemology that connects word and world. We should now be better able to see that a representation (or presentation for that that historians (and indeed all human beings in any situation that demands a description) offer propositions as to what is the state of reality.

But Collingwood, ultimately a realist, drew back from what in later years has become the post-empiricist and Foucauldian tropic or poetic end result to his line of thought. Collingwood argued that metaphor is the mechanism that enables the historian to create the correct mental picture of things as they actually occurred. Collingwood, however, missed the point understood later by Foucault and White, that history is about the textualised rendition and exploration of cultural power. This failure to rethink history, or think the unthinkable, that facts and truth do not necessarily correspond, has led mainstream historians to share the conclusion of the philosopher of history William B.

The cold water of the post-empiricist reversal may be seen in how deconstructionists, and increasingly constructionists, reject the belief that history, through its claim to representational authority, must correspond to the objectively knowable past. This is not, as some scare-mongering realists still like to suggest, to deny the factualism of the past (Warren 1998; Zagorin 1999). Denying factualism, it is said, results in the monstrosity of Holocaust denial and produces propaganda history. Well, it may well do that when empiricists do elect to tell lies.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.14 of 5 – based on 4 votes